harry teasley
2007-04-05 17:32:00 UTC
The feature request forum often has great ideas for things like UI
improvements. Would Adobe ever consider minor alterations to PS behavior or
feature set being put out as an incremental release?
As a software developer in games, I know our audience loves these sorts of
changes being incorporated in point updates, but Adobe has always had a
strategy of apparently never changing anything about the functionality of PS
in-between paid upgrades. It makes for a long 18 months for requests that look
like easy, low-hanging fruit for improving the app. I also note that these
sorts of feature updates generally make for an overall easier QA schedule:
monolithic updates take a load of time to test, but the same amount of actual
change in the app, spread out over time, make for less overall regression
testing, because less has changed per update.
improvements. Would Adobe ever consider minor alterations to PS behavior or
feature set being put out as an incremental release?
As a software developer in games, I know our audience loves these sorts of
changes being incorporated in point updates, but Adobe has always had a
strategy of apparently never changing anything about the functionality of PS
in-between paid upgrades. It makes for a long 18 months for requests that look
like easy, low-hanging fruit for improving the app. I also note that these
sorts of feature updates generally make for an overall easier QA schedule:
monolithic updates take a load of time to test, but the same amount of actual
change in the app, spread out over time, make for less overall regression
testing, because less has changed per update.